Marketplace vs managed
A marketplace sells you videos.You needed the posts to go live.
Both models work — at different volumes, for different amounts of your time. Start with the number that actually decides it.
One video did most of the work. We could not have told you which one.
This is the number most agencies leave out of the case study, and it's the one that should decide how you buy creator content.
89%
of a 5.8M-view campaign came from one video, out of 199.
- 5.2M · 89.4%@janienourished — one video
- 429K · 7.3%@avaswellnesss — one video
- 190K · 3.3%The other 197 videos, combined
Work out the rest and it stings: the other 197 videos averaged under a thousand views each. We are showing you that on purpose, because the alternative is letting you believe creator content behaves like a vending machine.
It doesn't. Nobody picks the breakout in advance — not us, not you, not the creator who shot it. The two things you can actually control are how many honest attempts you make and how fast you cut what isn't working. Everything in the managed model exists to raise those two numbers.
Which is the real problem with buying five videos and calling it a strategy. Five attempts against odds like these is a raffle ticket. The 197 that underperformed weren't waste — they were the price of finding the one, and every one of them fed what we knew before the next brief went out.
A UGC marketplace
You subscribe, post a brief, and creators apply. You pick them, manage them, review the work, and take delivery of the files. The platform's job finishes when the video is approved. Cheap per video, and every hour of coordination is yours.
Managed UGC
Someone else runs the operation: sourcing, screening, briefing, revisions, posting, and replacing whoever drops out. Costs more than a subscription. Takes about 45 minutes of your week instead of most of it.
Eight jobs. The only question is whose desk they land on.
| The job | Marketplace | Quizzy |
|---|---|---|
| Finding creators | You browse, filter, and pick | We source at scale against your niche |
| Screening them | You read profiles and hope | Paid test video before anyone joins your roster |
| Writing the brief | You, from a blank page | Starts from a video that already won in your niche |
| Revisions | You review and write the notes | We run the loop until it's approved |
| Posting | You — the file just lands in your inbox | Posted and verified live, with proof |
| A creator drops out | You find someone new this week | Bench replacement, same day |
| Knowing what to make next | Your instinct, every month | Post-level data decides — kill or scale |
| What they're graded on | Videos delivered | Planned vs Posted |
How a roster actually gets built
The 95 creators on that campaign weren't picked off a list. Sourcing at the volume the maths demands is most of the work, and it's the part a subscription hands back to you.
Thousands of applicants per campaign
Not a shortlist. Reach at this scale is the only way the next two steps have anything to work with.
Screened on a paid test video, not a profile
A portfolio shows you what somebody shot once with good lighting and unlimited time. A paid test video shows you whether they can hit a brief on a deadline — which is the only thing that matters once a schedule exists.
Contracts to the few who deliver
Most applicants don't make it. 95 did, across 199 posts — roughly two posts each, because a roster is wide on purpose.
A bench behind the roster
Someone will go quiet the week you need them. With a bench that's a same-day swap instead of a fortnight of your evenings.
Ten to twelve videos, then the data decides
The 89% is exactly why nobody gets judged on one video — including us. Every creator gets a real run before anything is concluded.
A breakout past 10K views gets scaled
More briefs, more budget, more of whatever they did. Winners are found, not forecast, so the moment one appears the job is to feed it.
Strugglers get coached before they get cut
With the hooks, audio, and edits that already worked for someone else on your roster — a specific fix from a real result, not a note saying make it punchier.
Pay is wired to the same outcome
A base fee for approved videos, then CPM bonuses that climb with views. Nobody on the roster is indifferent to whether a post performs.
Every note becomes permanent
Feedback goes into a running list the next brief is written against, so a correction is made once. Month three is sharper than month one without you doing anything.
What it costs, and when we're the wrong answer
We start at $2,000/month, scoped to volume. That is several times a marketplace subscription and we're not going to pretend otherwise.
We won't quote their prices here either — they change, and a stale number on our page would be worth less to you than their own pricing page. Compare the subscription plus per-video cost yourself. The line that usually gets left out of that sum is your own hours, so put a real number on an hour of your time and add it in.
Below roughly ten posts a month, we cost more than we save. Use a marketplace, keep the difference, and come back when the coordination stops fitting in your week.
Under 10 posts/mo
Use a marketplace
The coordination genuinely fits in your week, and at this volume you're unlikely to catch a breakout either way. Paying someone to manage it is waste.
10–20 posts/mo
It depends on your week
Workable alone if creator ops is somebody's actual job. Painful if it's the fourth thing on a founder's list.
20–500 posts/mo
Managed, or hire a team
Past this line the coordination is a full-time role, and you're finally making enough attempts for the maths to work. Your options are a headcount or an operator.
Real posts, real handles, including the quiet ones
A sample across two campaigns. We've left the 25K posts in alongside the 5.2M one, because a page showing only winners tells you nothing about the shape of the thing.
| Creator | Campaign | Views | Likes |
|---|---|---|---|
| @janienourished | Telehealth app | 5.2M | 752K |
| @avaswellnesss | Telehealth app | 429K | 77.3K |
| @carystudiessat | Pursu | 230K | 24.3K |
| @carystudiessat | Pursu | 78.1K | 5.8K |
| @aanisatcorner | Pursu | 43.4K | 4.9K |
| @carystudiessat | Pursu | 32K | 2.7K |
| @carystudiessat | Pursu | 29.7K | 2.7K |
| @addystudiessat | Pursu | 25.1K | 968 |
Telehealth figures pulled 31 July 2026; Pursu figures 10 July 2026. Full case study, including what went wrong.
Every option, including the ones that aren't us
Six of these seven are the same category as each other — self-serve, you do the coordinating. Switching between them changes your invoice, not your workload. That's the distinction worth understanding before you pick anything.
| Option | How it works | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Insense | Self-serve platform — brief in, creators apply, rights handed over | Raw files for paid social, with a deep roster to filter yourself |
| Billo | Productized ordering — you write the spec, they deliver the edit | A few polished creatives fast, when you know the ad you want |
| JoinBrands | Creator marketplace — list a job, creators apply per job | Breadth of creators and one-off product seeding |
| Trend | Creator network — a curated roster rather than an open marketplace | Fewer, more considered collaborations |
| SideShift | App-first creator marketplace — creators browse and apply to brand gigs | Reaching a mobile-first creator base at self-serve prices |
| Influee | Self-serve UGC platform, positioned on roster size | Volume of creator options at self-serve prices |
| Cohley | Brand-side creator content platform | Larger brands wanting content and reviews through one system |
| Quizzy | Managed operation — sourcing, briefing, posting and replacements run for you | 20–500 posts a month that you want off your desk entirely |
Each description uses the platform's own public positioning as of August 2026 and covers how the model works, not how well anyone runs it. We've left prices out because they change; check their pricing pages. If we've described your product wrongly, tell us and we'll fix it.
Already on a platform?
What each one leaves you holding, step by step.
vs Insense
Read the comparisonvs Billo
Read the comparisonvs JoinBrands
Read the comparisonvs SideShift
Read the comparison
Or skip the reading and get a plan
Engagements start at $2,000/month, scoped to volume. The first call is free and ends with a plan you can take or leave.
Book a Demo